mirror of
https://github.com/Instadapp/boardroom-inc-protocol-Info.git
synced 2024-07-29 22:37:02 +00:00
51 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
51 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
### Governance Update
|
||
|
||
#### Live Votes
|
||
| Name | Category | Link |
|
||
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:|
|
||
| GIP-6 Deploy Gnosis Auction | Development | [Vote](https://app.boardroom.info/gnosis/poll/QmUA5aYzD7nRdPQhqMTH3GWus4Bj62SGcSfjPEb6QcDdnM) |
|
||
|
||
This GIP intends to answer the question: Should GnosisDAO deploy GnosisAuction?
|
||
GnosisAuction would build on the proven success with token sales that Gnosis Protocol (GP) v1 (Mesa) had. It will provide a sturdy mechanism that supports fair price finding in token sales. It will also aim to be modular enough to work in other scenarios where auctions are needed.
|
||
|
||
#### Recent Votes
|
||
| Name | Category | Link |
|
||
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:|
|
||
| GIP-5: Remove Gnosis Impact from the GnosisDAO Governance Process | Meta | [View](https://app.boardroom.info/gnosis/poll/QmfEpoQtvjWMeRwfeFvothLDkFqaXCZNHU9ZFb3S3cuLRU) |
|
||
|
||
Gnosis Impact is currently an integral component of the Gnosis governance process.
|
||
The current implementation of Gnosis Impact has known flaws and poses uncalled-for obstacles to pass proposals through the governance process.
|
||
This proposal aims to exclude the obligatory utilization of Gnosis Impact as part of the GnosisDAO’s governance process phase 3 until a proposal passes amending its shortcomings.
|
||
|
||
This proposal passed on Feb 19th.
|
||
|
||
| Name | Category | Link |
|
||
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:|
|
||
| GIP-3: Set the quorum for "yes" votes to 4% of the circulating supply of GNO | Meta | [View](https://app.boardroom.info/gnosis/poll/QmdjWuBnBnPUafW9jBNNsJJvaeQAVExGcFZ7zB38VtNuu4) |
|
||
|
||
Lower the quorum threshold for required YES GNO to increase the chance of acceptance of proposals. Instead of the current 10%, the threshold could be lowered to 4% of circulating supply.
|
||
|
||
This proposal passed on February 22nd.
|
||
|
||
#### Discussions
|
||
| Name | Category | Link |
|
||
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:|
|
||
| GIP-4: Should GnosisDAO pay additional GNO rewards for GNO<>ETH LP on Sushiswap? | Marketing | [Discuss](https://forum.gnosis.io/t/gip-4-should-gnosisdao-pay-additional-gno-rewards-for-gno-eth-lp-on-sushiswap/1013) |
|
||
|
||
The objective of this proposal is to kick off a crossDAO collaboration attempting to increase number of stakeholders for both communities (Sushi and GnosisDAO). The proposal seeks a liquidity incentivisation campaign with the following goals:
|
||
- Creating stakeholders for both communities
|
||
- Foment cross-DAO collaborations in the future
|
||
- Increase GNO liquidity
|
||
|
||
| Name | Category | Link |
|
||
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:|
|
||
| Should GnosisDAO establish OWL as a stable coin? | Product | [Discuss](https://forum.gnosis.io/t/should-gnosisdao-establish-owl-as-a-stable-coin/1088) |
|
||
|
||
This proposal suggests to morph OWL into an asset backed stable coin - similar to DAI.
|
||
|
||
Compared to DAI there would be key differences:
|
||
1) Holding OWL should accrue interest. (similar to DSR - but in contrast to DAI all OWL should benefit from this interest) OWL == CHAI
|
||
2) Minting of OWL is (at least in the beginning) primarily done by GnosisDAO
|
||
3) All assets controlled by GnosisDAO are essentially collateral for OWL
|
||
4) In contrast to Maker - GnosisDAO could freely use the assets to do e.g. yield farming
|