mirror of
https://github.com/Instadapp/boardroom-inc-protocol-Info.git
synced 2024-07-29 22:37:02 +00:00
42 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
42 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
|
### Governance Update
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Recent Votes
|
||
|
|
| Name | Category | Link |
|
||
|
|
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:|
|
||
|
|
| GIP-4: Should GnosisDAO pay additional GNO rewards for GNO<>ETH LP on Sushiswap? | Strategy | [view](https://app.boardroom.info/gnosis.eth/poll/QmdbLM9oRMZcKeK7AXR2xkLvSwV6mvCy9y5xP5BDYKEcEW) |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The objective of this proposal is to kick off a crossDAO collaboration attempting to increase number of stakeholders for both communities (Sushi and GnosisDAO). The proposal seeks a liquidity incentivisation campaign with the following goals:
|
||
|
|
1) Creating stakeholders for both communities
|
||
|
|
2) Foment cross-DAO collaborations in the future
|
||
|
|
3) Increase GNO liquidity
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Update: This vote ended on Mar 4th. It failed to pass as the 4% Yes GNO quorom was not reached
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### New Topics
|
||
|
|
| Name | Category | Link |
|
||
|
|
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:|
|
||
|
|
| Should GnosisDAO launch a Liquidity Mining program for prediction markets using Gnosis Conditional Tokens? | Marketing | [Discuss](https://forum.gnosis.io/t/should-gnosisdao-launch-a-liquidity-mining-program-for-prediction-markets-using-gnosis-conditional-tokens/1109) |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Proposal for GnosisDAO to launch a Liquidity Mining program for prediction markets using Gnosis Conditional Tokens that would reward liquidity providers with GNO to incentivize a curated set of markets and thus boost the use of Gnosis Conditional Tokens.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Ongoing Discussions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
| Name | Category | Link |
|
||
|
|
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:|
|
||
|
|
| Should GnosisDAO establish OWL as a stable coin? | Product | [Discuss](https://forum.gnosis.io/t/should-gnosisdao-establish-owl-as-a-stable-coin/1088) |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This proposal suggests to morph OWL into an asset backed stable coin - similar to DAI.
|
||
|
|
Compared to DAI there would be key differences:
|
||
|
|
1) Holding OWL should accrue interest. (similar to DSR - but in contrast to DAI all OWL should benefit from this interest) OWL == CHAI
|
||
|
|
2) Minting of OWL is (at least in the beginning) primarily done by GnosisDAO
|
||
|
|
3) All assets controlled by GnosisDAO are essentially collateral for OWL
|
||
|
|
4) In contrast to Maker - GnosisDAO could freely use the assets to do e.g. yield farming
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Update: Latest [post](https://forum.gnosis.io/t/should-gnosisdao-establish-owl-as-a-stable-coin/1088/12) urges against this proposal and in favor of deprecating OWL while making it redeemable for GNO from the DAO treasury. Less products = more clarity for the community and for investors.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
| Name | Category | Link |
|
||
|
|
| ------------- |:-------------:| :-----:|
|
||
|
|
| Should GnosisDAO allow to use GNO locked in balancer pools for voting in snapshot proposals? | Meta | [Discuss](https://forum.gnosis.io/t/should-gnosisdao-allow-to-use-gno-locked-in-balancer-pools-for-voting-in-snapshot-proposals/902) |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Proposal to allow GNO locked up in Balancer to be used for voting on snapshot proposals.
|