2020-09-04 14:27:35 +00:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: agpl-3.0
|
|
|
|
pragma solidity 0.6.8;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* @dev Collection of functions related to the address type
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
library Address {
|
2020-09-09 19:26:52 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* @dev Returns true if `account` is a contract.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* [IMPORTANT]
|
|
|
|
* ====
|
|
|
|
* It is unsafe to assume that an address for which this function returns
|
|
|
|
* false is an externally-owned account (EOA) and not a contract.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Among others, `isContract` will return false for the following
|
|
|
|
* types of addresses:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* - an externally-owned account
|
|
|
|
* - a contract in construction
|
|
|
|
* - an address where a contract will be created
|
|
|
|
* - an address where a contract lived, but was destroyed
|
|
|
|
* ====
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
function isContract(address account) internal view returns (bool) {
|
|
|
|
// According to EIP-1052, 0x0 is the value returned for not-yet created accounts
|
|
|
|
// and 0xc5d2460186f7233c927e7db2dcc703c0e500b653ca82273b7bfad8045d85a470 is returned
|
|
|
|
// for accounts without code, i.e. `keccak256('')`
|
|
|
|
bytes32 codehash;
|
|
|
|
bytes32 accountHash = 0xc5d2460186f7233c927e7db2dcc703c0e500b653ca82273b7bfad8045d85a470;
|
|
|
|
// solhint-disable-next-line no-inline-assembly
|
|
|
|
assembly {
|
|
|
|
codehash := extcodehash(account)
|
2020-09-04 14:27:35 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-09 19:26:52 +00:00
|
|
|
return (codehash != accountHash && codehash != 0x0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-04 14:27:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-09 19:26:52 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* @dev Replacement for Solidity's `transfer`: sends `amount` wei to
|
|
|
|
* `recipient`, forwarding all available gas and reverting on errors.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1884[EIP1884] increases the gas cost
|
|
|
|
* of certain opcodes, possibly making contracts go over the 2300 gas limit
|
|
|
|
* imposed by `transfer`, making them unable to receive funds via
|
|
|
|
* `transfer`. {sendValue} removes this limitation.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* https://diligence.consensys.net/posts/2019/09/stop-using-soliditys-transfer-now/[Learn more].
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* IMPORTANT: because control is transferred to `recipient`, care must be
|
|
|
|
* taken to not create reentrancy vulnerabilities. Consider using
|
|
|
|
* {ReentrancyGuard} or the
|
|
|
|
* https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/v0.5.11/security-considerations.html#use-the-checks-effects-interactions-pattern[checks-effects-interactions pattern].
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
function sendValue(address payable recipient, uint256 amount) internal {
|
|
|
|
require(address(this).balance >= amount, 'Address: insufficient balance');
|
2020-09-04 14:27:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-09 19:26:52 +00:00
|
|
|
// solhint-disable-next-line avoid-low-level-calls, avoid-call-value
|
|
|
|
(bool success, ) = recipient.call{value: amount}('');
|
|
|
|
require(success, 'Address: unable to send value, recipient may have reverted');
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-04 14:27:35 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|